Rampant urbanisation has already transformed Lahore into a modern metropolitan and Bahria Town deserves a good amount of credit in this regard. The developer has launched housing projects that are not only high-end, but have also set benchmarks for other residential developments in the city.
The developer has been facing various controversies for a few months now, but remains quite confident about its performance, which is the reason why it does not pay much heed to any rumours and allegations hurled at it.
Recently, the Lahore Development Authority (LDA) – which has a number of housing projects to its name as well as a good amount of controversies – forbade the public from buying properties in Sectors D, E, F and Phase II of Bahria Town. In an online flyer published on its website, the LDA stated that Sectors D and E have not been approved by any competent authority. The same allegation has been made for Sector F, but with an additional claim: apparently, this sector is being marketed illegally through media advertisements. Bahria Orchard’s Phase II has also been hit hard in the same manner.
The online flyer hints at Clause 18(2) of the Private Housing Schemes & Land Subdivision Rules 2010, according to which properties in any project cannot be advertised before the housing scheme has been approved by the authorities concerned. Moreover, under Clause 40 of the LDA Act 1975, the civic authority is authorised to demolish illegal developments.
The LDA has warned prospective buyers to stay away from the projects in question and has clarified that the authority cannot and will not be held responsible for any losses that may occur.
Bahria Town’s Sector F is already a bone of contention between Bahria Town and property owners, who claim that the developer has failed to hand over possession well past the expected time. Furthermore, Lahore Ring Road’s southern loop, which is expected to cut through Bahria Town, is also a cause for lasting concern. Simply put, Bahria Town is facing a number of controversies. If left unattended, these can impair the developer’s goodwill and also shift investor focus.
Now let’s talk a little about the LDA. The authority has indeed made big claims, which will probably cause an immediate price drop in Bahria Town. But should the authority be pointing at issues in other societies when its own LDA Avenue I on Raiwind Road is still incomplete? Please note that the project was launched more than a decade ago!
LDA City, too, is in hot water. It is currently being dealt with by the National Accountability Bureau. The project was promulgated as the biggest residential project, spanning more than 60,000 kanals, but has shown no traces of development so far.
I am neither favouring Bahria Town nor the LDA – I am simply putting both sides of the argument on the table. With that, I am leaving this discussion open for you to comment on. Please use the comments section below to share your views on the topic.
Dear Zain,
You promised an update on Ring Road, its map and its impact on Bahria E, F and GVR. Hope you share your expert analysis soon.
Thanks
Assalam o alaikum,
Dear Ahmad,
There is no update on LRR as of now. Rest assured, I will cover the topic as soon as any information, in this regard, becomes available to me, InshaALLAH.
I suggest you give this article a read: http://www.zameen.com/blog/lda-brings-forth-a-unique-opportunity.html
Regards,
zain Nadeem
I have some questions for LDA.
Q1. Why not LDA doing any action against Bahria Town?
Q2. Is this enough to issue notice on website and newspaper by LDA to warn consumers that someone doing fraud?
Q3. Why not LDA publish approved map of all approved Housing scheme (including BT) on their website like CDA have done for Islamabad?
I can see clearly “Sanu ki” approach from LDA. Govt. of Punjab need to take serious notice of this situation.
As conclusion : LDA and provincial govt. need to facilitate BT kind of project but in the same time protect consumer by putting close eye on any malfunctioning by developer like DHA and BT.
Assalam o alaikum,
Dear Khalid,
You have raised some valid points. And I think before pointing the finger at others, the LDA needs to deal with the issues prevailing in its own housing projects.
Regards,
zain Nadeem
For me, it is really strange that on one advertisement LDA says that Sector D,E, F and Bahria orchard Phase 2 is illegal. http: //lda.gop. pk/page.php?p=TmpFeA== Against that Bahria town stated that bahria town is not under LDA, its will be approved by TMA Allama Iqbal. After few days i saw an announcement by LDA that now every housing society will get approved by LDA not any TMA any more. And then LDA recognize from the records of TMA Allama Iqbal that Sector D, E, F and Bahria orchard phase 2 are under process of approval. http:// lda.gop. pk/images//stories/violations_in_private_schemes/29_9_14_private_scheme.jpg Does not it seems fishy? Both links are from LDA official website and both narrates different stories. I think there may be some issue of settlement with officials of LDA.
Assalam o alaikum,
What kind of settlement issue do you think it is?
I mean bribe 🙂 BTW from other websites i come to know that Bahria town has given possession in G, J and H block of bahria orchard. If it is still not approved then how possession can be offered? Also please review the links which i have given in my comments which clearly states that Bahria Orchard was under TMA Allama Iqbal. Can you please shed light that bahria orchard is still illegal as per LDA?
Possessions in Phase-II (G, J, H blocks) are you sure? I doubt it; C, D might be given possessions first i believe.
Yes possession is being in above said blocks. Although it is not officially announced from Bahria. As far as C and D are concerned, development is both blocks are still pending. Although D block as almost 90% developed, but only last triangle need to be developed.
Any update of LDA Avenue development ?
Ahmad Bhai,
LDA Avenue I’s status us still unclear. Litigation issues are there, but possession has been handed over in clear area, which is probably of no use because the LDA has not yet started electricity supply. I met a homeowner in the Avenue I, who had taken electricity connection from a nearby village. I think he is the only one living there with his family.
Rest ALLAH knows better.
Regards,
zain Nadeem
LDA probably needs health bribe to clear Bahria Town controversy. Why they have not sent the flyer at the start of the project? Ultimately the one who suffer is a common man.
Thank you for your feedback Farooq Shb.
Kindly also shed some light on the points raised by Mr. Waqas above. The LDA / TMA juirisdictions issue.